Rahul Gandhi was recently convicted of criminal defamation in a Surat court, causing him to lose his seat in the Lok Sabha. The best-case scenario for him is that he is able to appeal the conviction and remain in Parliament, while the worst-case scenario is that he is unable to appeal the conviction and is removed from Parliament.
Wayanad MP Rahul Gandhi’s parliamentary membership was annulled following his conviction and sentencing by a local court in Surat on Thursday. The notice issued by the Lok Sabha secretariat on Friday states that Rahul is “disqualified from membership in the Lok Sabha from the date of his conviction, i.e. March 23, 2023, in accordance with the provisions of Article 102(1)(e) of the Constitution. India is read in conjunction with section 8 of the Representation of the People Act 1951.”
![](https://i0.wp.com/sanepanda.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/image-6-20-1024x576.webp?resize=900%2C506&ssl=1)
The Election Commission of India asked the state chief secretaries to tell the department dealing with prosecutions to make sure that cases of conviction of sitting MPs or MLAs are brought to the attention of the Speaker or Chairman of the House, and to the Chief Electoral Officer of the state, as soon as possible.
If you are convicted of a crime and sentenced to two years or more in prison, you will be disqualified from voting for six years after you are released.
If someone is convicted of a crime, their seat in the Parliament is automatically disqualified. This is different from the way the Parliament is notified of new laws. The notification is simply a formal announcement to Rahul, who was in the Parliament on Friday.
If an MLA from a particular party is disqualified from their position, that means the Vidhan Sabha (the state legislature) has found something wrong with them and has issued a notice telling them to stop doing their job. For example, in the case of Samajwadi Party MLA Azam Khan, the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly Secretariat issued a notice of disqualification in October last year.
![](https://i0.wp.com/sanepanda.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/image-6-19-jpg.webp?resize=541%2C780&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court ruled that if someone is convicted of a crime and their conviction is later stayed by a court, the disqualification that comes from the conviction will be reversed.
If Rahul’s conviction is stayed, the notification from the House Secretariat about him will stop being in effect.
There are a few things that can disqualify a parliamentarian from serving in parliament. These include if they have been convicted of a crime, if they are not of sound mind, or if they are not a citizen of the country.
If an MP is disqualified by or under the RP Act, he will lose his membership of the House.
Section 8 of the RP Act deals with the disqualification of a lawmaker from holding office if they have been convicted of certain offences. This is designed to stop politicians from being criminalized, and to keep ‘tainted’ lawmakers from running for office.
As a Lok Sabha MP, Rahul was entitled to a house in Lutyens’ Delhi. However, after he was disqualified from Parliament, he will have one month to vacate his 12 Tughlak Lane home.
The Lok Sabha Secretariat has sent a notification disqualifying you from Parliament. The sources say that since the bungalow you live in belongs to the Lok Sabha pool of residential properties, the action for its vacation would have to be initiated by the Lok Sabha Secretariat.
Rahul Gandhi loses some of the benefits that come with being a Member of Parliament.
The Election Commission can announce a byelection to the seat of Azam Khan (in his case, the schedule for the byelection to Khan’s 37-Rampur seat) very quickly.
![](https://i0.wp.com/sanepanda.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/image-6.png?resize=675%2C380&ssl=1)
The election commission (EC) announced that a by-election would be held in Lakshadweep MP P P Mohammed Faisal’s constituency on January 18, after he was convicted of a crime. However, the EC withdrew the announcement on January 30 after the High Court in Kerala suspended Faisal’s conviction.
If the court decides that there was a mistake or mistake on the part of the court, then the person’s conviction may be reversed. The person would have to go through a process of appeal first, starting with the lower court and then going to the higher court.
If he cannot get relief from the courts, he will be disqualified from running for office for eight years, which is two years of his sentence, plus six years under the provisions of the RP Act.
Kirit’s lawyer filed an application with the Surat court on Friday asking for more time to file an appeal.